How to be a true lover of cinema
*puts on a mask*
Re-define the word “cinema”
Objectively, it means the production and distribution of films. Nothing more or less. But, it shouldn’t be enough for you.
You have to define “cinema” as “good and artistic” films. You should never acknowledge mediocre films as parts of the “cinema”, even though they objectively are.
You have to be stubborn about it. You have to insist that definition is the only correct definition. If someone dares to spew the objective one, you have to shame them worse than you shame anti-vaxxers.
Be black-and-white
You cannot enjoy both the arts and escapist entertainment. It does not matter if most of the films you love are artistic; enjoying just one Marvel film will cancel out every single drop of your sophistication. One bad apple spoils the barrel.
Turn your love of film into your entire personality
Your self-worth as a human being is entirely decided by your film taste. Love just one bad film and you are as good as a book-burning Nazi.
Worship directors like Coppola, Scorsese and Tarantino
You know, the directors who make violent and/or action-packed films that win awards and profits from all over. You are not a true film lover until you admire the likes of them.
No, filmmakers like Andrey Tarkovsky and Ingmar Bergman do not count. Their films are too artsy. Good films should be artistic enough for critics, but not too artistic for Hollywood executives.
Yes, awards matter. It does not matter how a great film is. If it does not win any awards, it may as well be a Marvel film. A good filmmaker must commit the appeal to authority fallacy: defining their self-worth solely based on the establishments’ opinions.
Whitewash history
Yes, commercialisation has always existed and it reaches a new high in the recent years. But, you cannot acknowledge that.
You have to assert that commercialisation of cinema did not exist before the Marvel Cinematic Universe. You have to pretend old Hollywood was all about artistic integrity.
You have to ignore that directors like Coppola and Scorsese were given creative freedom NOT because Hollywood executives cared about the arts, but because those young directors increased ticket sales.
Take the human out of cinema
If you love a film simply because of how entertained you are or how enthralled you are by its beauty, then you are doing it wrong.
The only things you should care about are the techniques. Embracing your humanness is antithetical to the true purpose of cinema. You should consume films like a robot would.
Who cares if you are not into crime stories? If a crime film is well-made (and it wins awards), you have to love it. You must choose it as one of your favourite films ever!
Don’t be a human. Be a robot!
*takes off the mask*
.
.
.
.
.
Donate to this deadbeat, preachy blogger on Patreon.